<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lanvin vs Topshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wantandafford.com/2009/clothing/dresses/lanvin-vs-topshop-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wantandafford.com/2009/clothes/dresses/lanvin-vs-topshop-2/</link>
	<description>Luxury vs Mass fashion brands: if you WANT you can really AFFORD fashion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: budget chic</title>
		<link>http://wantandafford.com/2009/clothes/dresses/lanvin-vs-topshop-2/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>budget chic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wantandafford.com/?p=1535#comment-496</guid>
		<description>I like the topshop blouse vs the Lanvin dress.  It looked good on the model but it does not translate well on the celebrities.  Too much poofy-ness around the face and shoulder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the topshop blouse vs the Lanvin dress.  It looked good on the model but it does not translate well on the celebrities.  Too much poofy-ness around the face and shoulder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

